Iran talks were a major test for JD Vance. How did he do?
Iran Talks Were a Major Test for JD Vance. How Did He Do?
High-Level Negotiations in Islamabad Missed Key Targets
Following a tense 21-hour dialogue in Islamabad, US Vice President JD Vance returned without securing a major breakthrough in the ongoing diplomatic efforts to conclude the Iran conflict. The talks, which marked the highest-level engagement between Washington and Tehran in years, left many questions unanswered about the extent of progress achieved. While both sides exchanged proposals, they remained divided on core issues, notably the management of Iran’s nuclear program.
“No consensus emerged regarding the fate of Iran’s enriched uranium,” stated a US official, who remained anonymous during the discussions. The meeting also failed to resolve the issue of reopening the Strait of Hormuz without toll fees—a priority for former President Donald Trump—and securing Iran’s commitment to halt financial support for groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas.
Vance presented Iran with a final proposal on Saturday, though specifics were not disclosed. Despite the lack of agreement, the talks were described as “tough but friendly,” with both teams offering constructive ideas. The vice president left Islamabad believing Iran was exaggerating its stance but still optimistic about a possible resolution.
In contrast, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian emphasized that a deal with the US would depend on Washington abandoning its “totalitarianism” and acknowledging Iran’s national interests. Meanwhile, Trump expressed frustration over the stalemate, vowing to impose a blockade on the Strait of Hormuz “effective immediately” to force progress. The US military confirmed it would suspend all maritime traffic to and from Iranian ports starting Monday.
The negotiations served as a critical evaluation of Vance’s diplomatic acumen, especially as he prepares for a potential 2028 presidential bid. Selected to lead the US delegation alongside special envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, Vance faces scrutiny over his ability to navigate complex international relations. His public support for the war contrasts with private doubts he reportedly voiced about the military campaign during discussions with Trump.
Vance’s role in the talks was further highlighted by Trump’s absence, who instead watched a UFC match in Miami. This underscored the divided focus within the administration as the two-week ceasefire agreement approached its deadline. The lingering disagreements suggest the path to a full resolution remains uncertain, with the political stakes growing as the clock continues to tick.
For insights into the evolving dynamics of Trump’s second term, subscribe to North America correspondent Anthony Zurcher’s weekly US Politics Unspun newsletter. UK readers can join here, while international audiences can sign up here.
